Apart from a rumble of disgust at the British Government’s response 
to the refugee crisis, I have not heard much discussion about the U.K’s 
sorting criteria for ‘acceptable’ refugees.  Britain is not open to 
refugees on the move, irrespective of the reasons why.  What we hear, is
 that any refugees that Britain accepts will have to be in the official 
camps  They will include the most vulnerable, (whatever that means) and 
likely, orphan children.  Alarmist voices quickly channeled all the 
resources arguments against giving refuge to unaccompanied children. The
 same arguments have been raised in respect of the trickle of 
‘acceptable’ refugees over five years that Britain may give refuge too, (4000 per year).  In this instance the Westminster Government response was
 to offer time-limited assistance in areas where any refugees may be 
settled.
Funding the needs of extra people is a consideration, it has to be.  
While that discussion is being resolved both domestically and 
internationally, it is worth remembering history shows that  previous 
waves of refugees who arrived in Britain have and still do, substantially
 contribute to the wealth of this country.
Britain has not been mean with aid on the ground, far from it.  A 
major slice of basic aid in developing the camps, in particular, in 
Lebanon, has been given through the generosity of the British people.   
But, not all refugees are in camps, there are a large number eking out 
an existence in  sub-standard conditions in countries like Jordan.  That
 said, their need to  be fed is no different from the refugees in the 
other camps.   Like many in camps, (including camps in Turkey) they are
 now being forced to move on because the United Nations (U.N) which has 
been supporting these camps with food aid, has run out of money for food
 aid for  the refugees. The U.N has been reliant on international 
financial donations to support vast numbers of people with food.  
Starkly put, the refugees, whether in camps or shacks, can no longer be 
fed.  Their choices for survival – the basic human instinct – are 
limited to moving on, to attempt to survive.  Life becomes a lottery.  In
 trying to survive many die.
Communities around the U.K have spontaneously been taking practical 
steps; there have been collections of warm clothing for people stuck at 
Calais and other ports, who have arrived  at these places wearing their 
sandals and lightweight clothing, none of which is suitable for 
surviving Northern European Winters. In Vienna,  clothing donated from 
many sources  is given to the refugees as they arrive in the city. I 
expect the same scenario will have been enacted throughout other refugee
 arrival points, where refugees are being treated  with dignity.  Sad to
 say, treating the refugees with dignity  is not universal.
I was appalled to hear the rhetoric of Fascism by the Hungarian 
Government and from other Eastern European States. The Balkan Wars and 
the Hungarian uprising against Russian suppression  are all still within
 living memory.  They created refugees who were desperate for help.  
Some of my faith in humanity was restored when I saw and heard the 
reports of the Hungarian people individually helping refugees, 
irrespective of their Government’s distasteful stance.
The UK has no need to swell its population with young and intelligent
 people from elsewhere to support an ageing population as much as some 
of our neighbour countries do, (like France and Germany, for example).  
 So, to minimise our responsibility to what the world has now accepted 
is a true refugee crisis, (as opposed to economic migrants) from Africa 
and the Middle East,  this is what the British Government says it is 
going to do over five years.  Britain will consider taking  a total of 
20,000 ‘acceptable’ Refugees, (4000 per year) who are in official 
refugee camps.  Perhaps, from those selected  there will be orphan 
children.  You are definitely not going to be offered refuge in the U.K 
if you are a refugee with the many thousands on the move,  who are  
risking life and limb to survive.
Digging out compost
21 hours ago
 
 

 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
4 comments:
Yes,what should we do?It's a time when governments need to hurry before more deaths occur.... if onlly
...if only Kate. I agree
I would have thought that the pressure for peace should be aimed at governments in the Middle East .
Hi Mary,
I don't think anyone would disagree with your premise.
Thanks for your comment.
Post a Comment